RE: Clarifying assertion for HTTP Location
"Jonathan Marsh" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.services.description |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <00ce01c723bf$baea6e40$3401a8c0@DELLICIOUS> |
I don't think this binding supports mapping an output or fault to an HTTP request message. It only supports the in-out, in-only, and robust-in-only MEPs, in which the input message maps to the HTTP request. Jonathan Marsh - <http://www.wso2.com> http://www.wso2.com - <http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com> http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com _____ From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of John Kaputin (gmail) Sent: Monday, December 18, 2006 3:56 AM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] Subject: Clarifying assertion for HTTP Location Part 2 section 6.7.1.1 Construction of the request IRI using the {http location} property. This section contains the assertion: "Strings enclosed within single curly braces MUST be element names from the instance data of the input message." I assume 'input message' here refers generically to any input data for the HTTP request (i.e. to a WSDL input, output or fault message element). To make this clearer and to keep it consistent with the description at hyperlink "instance data", perhaps you could restate this something like: "Strings enclosed within single curly braces MUST be element names from the instance data of the input, output or fault message." regards, John Kaputin.