Re: Proposed response: Default Action Pattern for inherited faults

Agreed.

regards,
Ram


On 1/22/07, Paul Knight <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> The WG considered this as well as the issue in
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing/2006Dec/0019.ht
> ml
>
> and came to the conclusion that no action is needed.
>
> A key point we considered is that infault and outfault with the same
> name might be an issue, but not for WSDL 1.1.
> It was also pointed out in the discussion that the default pattern does
> take into account the direction, so it is not an issue, because the
> direction token may be used to differentiate between input and output.
>
> In general, the response agreed by the WG is that faults are inherited
> and the interface should work, therefore no change is required.
>
> - Paul
>
> Paul Knight
> Standards Advisor - SOA & Web Services
> Nortel
>
>
>


-- 
Shift to the left, shift to the right!
Pop up, push down, byte, byte, byte!

-Ramkumar Menon
A typical Macroprocessor