RE: operation safety as semantic annotation?

<[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.services.description
Message-ID <2A7793353757DB4392DF4DFBBC9522550A20146F@I2KM11-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net>
> Operation safety is, at least to me, a clear semantic annotation. It
> says nothing about the structure of the interface, 

but it can be used to determine if a binding can use HTTP GET, which isn't just semantic ..

> I would propose that we change the syntax from wsdlx:safe="true"  to
> sawsdl:modelReference="http://www.w3.org/2006/01/wsdl-extensions#SafeInteraction"

what's the issue with the current short syntax - can't sawsdl easily define a mapping?

do you think that's likely to encourage more people to flag their 
"getCustomerAddress" method as being safe, something I think we're 
both after?

Paul
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.