RE: operation safety as semantic annotation?
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.services.description |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <2A7793353757DB4392DF4DFBBC9522550A20146F@I2KM11-UKBR.domain1.systemhost.net> |
> Operation safety is, at least to me, a clear semantic annotation. It > says nothing about the structure of the interface, but it can be used to determine if a binding can use HTTP GET, which isn't just semantic .. > I would propose that we change the syntax from wsdlx:safe="true" to > sawsdl:modelReference="http://www.w3.org/2006/01/wsdl-extensions#SafeInteraction" what's the issue with the current short syntax - can't sawsdl easily define a mapping? do you think that's likely to encourage more people to flag their "getCustomerAddress" method as being safe, something I think we're both after? Paul