Re: Assertion on Bindings for Interface that only define faults
Amelia A Lewis <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.services.description |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Heyo, --On February 6, 2007 8:13:36 PM -0800 Ramkumar Menon <[email protected]> wrote: > I assume that it does not make sense, and is an error to define a Binding > component for an Interface Component that defines only Faults. Does this > call for a new assertion ? I can see a use case, for a "mix-in" interface. Perhaps that's stretching a point. In any event, while it may seem pointless, I don't see that it is an error. Amy! -- Amelia A. Lewis Senior Architect TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc. [email protected]