RE: SA-WSDL files for the WSDL test suite

Jonathan,

Thx.

John - fyi, the test case that Jacek reported as causing a failure in 
Woden M6 is now in the test suite along with several others. Pls rerun the 
results on M7. Thx.

Arthur Ryman,
IBM Software Group, Rational Division

blog: http://ryman.eclipsedevelopersjournal.com/
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-2411, TL 969-2411
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: [email protected]



"Jonathan Marsh" <[email protected]> 
Sent by: [email protected]
02/09/2007 01:09 AM

To
"'Jacek Kopecky'" <[email protected]>
cc
"'WS-Description WG'" <[email protected]>
Subject
RE: SA-WSDL files for the WSDL test suite







I added these to the test suite, though wsdl-xslt doesn't have support for
the SAWSDL extension yet, and I'll need to write the interchange format
extension schema...

Regenerated zips for Woden as well.

Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - 
http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jacek Kopecky [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 5:10 AM
> To: Jonathan Marsh
> Cc: 'WS-Description WG'
> Subject: RE: SA-WSDL files for the WSDL test suite
> 
> Hi Jonathan,
> on the topic of keeping the test cases in sync with their source, maybe
> the TestMetadata.xml could contain a source URI and the testing
> infrastructure could just update the local copy once in a while if the
> source URI is provided.
> On the question of support, in our implementation efforts, we expect to
> extend Woden (and maybe WSDL4J for WSDL1.1) to support SAWSDL, but I'm
> not sure about how this would show up in the component model
> (interchange format).
> 
> Jacek
> 
> On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 12:01 -0800, Jonathan Marsh wrote:
> > I agree these would be great to add to the test suite, esp. the
> plain.wsdl
> > to ensure you're annotating something our tools have reported success
> with.
> >
> > The other test cases, which require support for an extension, would be
> > useful for testing of validators, but would not show up on the
> interchange
> > results unless implementations declared support for them.  Since the
> > extension is straightforward, I would be able to trivially support it 
in
> > wsdl-xslt, and would be willing to do that work at some point.
> >
> > However, the sparql-query test case demonstrates that we don't have a
> good
> > model for sharing test cases.  If we copy the test cases into our test
> > suite, how should they be kept in sync?  Should we write a task that
> > refreshes them from your "master" copy?  Should we own the master and
> have
> > you maintain them in one place?
> >
> > Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com -
> http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> On
> > > Behalf Of Jacek Kopecky
> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 3:11 AM
> > > To: WS-Description WG
> > > Subject: SA-WSDL files for the WSDL test suite
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > > there are 18 WSDL 2.0 documents at [1] annotated with SAWSDL
> attributes
> > > for the purposes of the SAWSDL's nascent test suite [2] that might 
be
> > > useful in the WSDL test suite as well.
> > >
> > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/CR/wsdl2.0/
> > > [2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/sawsdl/CR/testsuite
> > >
> > > It's basically one simple WSDL document annotated in various places
> with
> > > our extension attributes, but I've already had a problem with Woden
> > > parsing of 04-fault-annotation.wsdl due to what seems to be a bug in
> > > fault reference handling, so maybe the files could be helpful.
> > >
> > > Currently the links are member-only, but I'm working on fixing that.
> And
> > > I'll zip the files and send them to somebody if that would help. I
> don't
> > > feel comfortable updating the WSDL test suite directly myself, 
having
> > > never done it before.
> > >
> > > Hope it helps,
> > > Jacek
> >
> >
> >