CR126: Proposed revised wording

The resolution for CR126 says:

<original>
A WSDL 2.0 document that contains a required unengaged extension is invalid.
</original>

However, unengaged-ness of an extension is a runtime property, whilst 
invalidity is a "compile-time" property. Shouldn't the resolution be 
instead:

<revised>
A extension that is declared as mandatory for a particular interaction 
MUST be engaged by the client or Web service for that interaction.
</revised>

?

JJ.