Re: CR112, CR144, and everything

Jean-Jacques Moreau <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.services.description
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
>> Isn't the text you quote above already covered elsewhere (e.g. 5.10.4.xxx)? Can't we simply drop it?
>>     
>
> I don't believe so since we only provide mapping to SOAP
> Request-Response in 5.10.4. IMO, 5.10.4 should cover SOAP Response as well, thus my question.
>   
Don't we cover SOAP-Response in 5.10.4.2 ?
>> But not to the exact same Req-Resp MEP! (although they share the same 
>> URI and, probably?, the same behaviour) See my earlier message [3].
>>     
>
> ok. Btw, we will link to the latest SOAP 1.2 REC, ie the one that will
> contain the revised SOAP Request-Response MEP.
>   
Could this break our implementations?

JJ.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.