RE: CR120 (was: Status: Editorial action items)

OK, that makes sense, but I still think there's a hole, namely how to
construct the "In" message when the content model is #any.  The intent of
CR120 was to allow #none, not to allow #any and #other to be bound to SOAP
Response...  Perhaps we simply make it explicit for SOAP Response that 'The
{message content model} MUST be either #element or #none.  The "In" message
is empty when the content model is #none.'

Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jean-Jacques Moreau [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 7:57 AM
> To: Jonathan Marsh
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: CR120 (was: Status: Editorial action items)
> 
> Some more...
> 
> Jonathan Marsh wrote:
> > ----------
> > Re CR120, can you point me to where the fix has been made?  I can't find
> it where I expected it - the second sentence of 6.8.2.
> >
> I've implemented the fix in 5.10.4.2.2, i.e. set the value of "In" only
> when the type is #element. (Hence, by implication, do nothing when #none.)
> 
> My reading of 6.4.3, bullet 1.2:
> > If the value is "#none" then the payload MUST be empty and the value
> > of the corresponding serialization property ({http input
> > serialization} or {http output serialization}) is ignored.
> .. was that there was no other change to perform.
> 
> Am I missing something?
> 
> JJ.