Re: Additional MEPs?

Jonathan, Jean-Jacques:

I have a number of open issues against the version in CVS.  I have to 
dig up my w3c private key (hoping that I haven't lost it in the process 
of switching machines) in order to get access.  (ah, there it is)  And 
then I need to actually do the edits suggested, including the name 
change suggested here.

Can you give me an action in tomorrow's call, perhaps?  That way it can 
be tracked: Amy to complete editorial revisions of Additional MEPs note, 
and a deadline of next week's teleconference, and I'll clear it off my list.

Thanks.

Amy!

Jonathan Marsh wrote:
> Thanks for reminding us!  I've been over-focussed on Part 1 and 2.  I
> distinctly recall adding a link to the spec on the home page recently -
> perhaps I then wiped it out with my klutzy handling of CVS...
> 
> IIRC, we decided to publish this spec as a Note concurrently with the rest
> of the specs.  The suggestions at [1] don't seem to have been implemented.
> I haven't tracked them in any way either.
> 
> Amy, what is the current state of the document?  Ready to publish?  (FWIW, I
> would favor a name more in keeping with the rest of the "family", e.g. "Web
> Services Description Language (WSDL) Version 2.0: Additional MEPs").
> 
> And Jacek, are we all caught up with the RDF Mapping?
> 
> The list of specs we have to publish is:
> 
> - Primer
> - Part 1: Core
> - Part 2: Adjuncts
> - Additional MEPs (Note)
> - SOAP 1.1 Binding (Note)
> - RDF Mapping (Note)
> 
> It would be nice to publish the Notes at the same time WSDL 2.0 goes to
> final Recommendation.  It would probably also be nice to refresh them as
> Working Drafts when we publish the PR, so final reviewers can see the whole
> family.
> 
> Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com
>  
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
>> Behalf Of Jean-Jacques Moreau
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2007 8:18 AM
>> To: WSD Public
>> Subject: Additional MEPs?
>>
>>
>> About to respond to a message from XMLP, wanting to point to our
>> "additional MEPs" document, unable to find it on our home page... Did we
>> decide to not publish this document [1] in the end? (I can't remember
>> one way or the other.)
>>
>> JJ.
>>
>> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Nov/0008.html
>>
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Amelia A. Lewis
Senior Architect
TIBCO/Extensibility, Inc.
[email protected]