Re: MessageTest-3G Assertions
Youenn Fablet <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.services.description |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I agree on GET.
Having a content-type on PUT seems reasonnable to me.
I was also thinking that DELETE may not need a content-type.
What do you think?
Youenn
Jonathan Marsh wrote:
> I think I agree, and have updated the assertion generator to omit assertions
> about content-type on GET and PUT methods (this isn't a complete fix - it
> doesn't take safety into account, but seems sufficient for the existing
> tests.)
>
> Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com
>
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Youenn Fablet [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 6:04 AM
>> To: Jonathan Marsh
>> Cc: www-ws-desc
>> Subject: MessageTest-3G Assertions
>>
>> The MessageTest-3G test case bounds some operations to GET and DELETE.
>> For those operations, the test framework checks that the content-type
>> header is set to "application/x-www-form-urlencoded".
>> I am wondering whether we should remove these assertions.
>> What do you think?
>> Regards,
>> Youenn Fablet
>>
>
>
>