Re: Editorial status

I guess I was trying to figure out why JJM had implemented the part 2 
aspects of the resolution but not the part 1 ones. Is it a trap?  :-)

Jonathan Marsh wrote:
> I think Philippe volunteered to do CR136.
> 
> I haven't heard whether Roberto is willing to do CR044 or not ;-).
> 
> Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com
> 
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jean-Jacques Moreau [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 3:15 AM
>> To: Jonathan Marsh
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: Editorial status
>>
>> I've just DONE CR138. Since you've also DONE CR149, we're now down to:
>>
>> 1) CR044 [1]: There is still some non-trivial Part 1 work to do to
>> clarify interface-less bindings.  Since the proposal originates with
>> Roberto, perhaps he'd be willing to finish this item off?
>>
>> 4) CR136 [5]: simple Part 1 editorial work.
>>
>> 7) CR145 [9]: Roberto promised to implement the Part 1.
>>
>>
>> Since Arthur best knows how to generate the component table, perhaps
>> he'd be willing to do CR136?
>>
>> JJ.
>>
>> Jonathan Marsh wrote:
>>> Here's a list of outstanding items, either with associated action
>>> items open or some question about the implementation of the resolution:
>>>
>>> 1) CR044 [1]: There is still some non-trivial Part 1 work to do to
>>> clarify interface-less bindings.  Since the proposal originates with
>>> Roberto, perhaps he'd be willing to finish this item off?
>>>
>>> 2) CR112 [2]: The Part 2 fixes seem to be in (though 112 is not in
>>> JJM's completed action list), but we still need to add to Part 1 a
>>> warning against ? in {address}.
>>>
>>> 3) CR120 [3]: I still have questions about the fix [4].
>>>
>>> 4) CR136 [5]: simple Part 1 editorial work.
>>>
>>> 5) CR138 [6]: simple Part 1 editorial work.
>>>
>>> 6) CR143 [7]: I still have questions about the fix [8]
>>>
>>> 7) CR145 [9]: Roberto promised to implement the Part 1.
>>>
>>> 8) CR149 [10]: simple Part 1 editorial work.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR044
>>>
>>> [2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR112
>>>
>>> [3] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR120
>>>
>>> [4] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2007Feb/0129.html
>>>
>>> [5] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR136
>>>
>>> [6] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR138
>>>
>>> [7] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR143
>>>
>>> [8] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2007Feb/0128.html
>>>
>>> [9] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR145
>>>
>>> [10] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/issues.html#CR149
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> All other closed issues seem to have been implemented satisfactorily
>>> in the drafts, and I've responded to each of the commenters.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> **Jonathan Marsh** - http://www.wso2.com -
>>> http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com