RE: Bug 4431 - Proposed Edit Needs Review

+1

Arthur Ryman, PhD, AoT, DE
Process and Portfolio Management, Rational Division

phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-3831 (T/L: 318-8867)
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: [email protected]



"Jonathan Marsh" <[email protected]> 
Sent by: [email protected]
04/17/2007 02:57 PM

To
Arthur Ryman/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA, <[email protected]>
cc

Subject
RE: Bug 4431 - Proposed Edit Needs Review






Nit I know, but it still reads a little redundant, or even circular, with 
your proposal:
 
Two component instances of the same type are considered equivalent if, for 
each
property of the first component, there is a corresponding property with an
equivalent value, as defined in the following sentence, on the second
component, and vice versa.
 
Instances of properties of the same type are considered equivalent if 
their
values are equivalent.
 
Would it read better as:
 
Two component instances of the same type are considered equivalent if, for 
each
property of the first component, there is an equivalent property on the 
second
component, and vice versa.
 
Instances of properties are considered equivalent if they have the same 
type and their
values are equivalent.
 
?
 
Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com - 
http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com
 
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Arthur Ryman
Sent: Sunday, April 15, 2007 3:06 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Bug 4431 - Proposed Edit Needs Review
 

Please review my proposal [1] 

[1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4431 

Arthur Ryman, PhD, AoT, DE
Process and Portfolio Management, Rational Division

phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-3831 (T/L: 318-8867)
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: [email protected]