Re: small problems in part 1 appendix C

Jacek,

1) I agree this should be added to tighten up the spec for canonical form. 
I'll wait for Jonathan to reply before I change it.

2) Yes, that's a typo. I'll fix it immediately.

Arthur Ryman, PhD, AoT, DE
Process and Portfolio Management, Rational Division

phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-3831 (T/L: 318-8867)
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: [email protected]



Jacek Kopecky <[email protected]> 
Sent by: [email protected]
04/25/2007 11:19 AM

To
WS-Description WG <[email protected]>
cc

Subject
small problems in part 1 appendix C







Hi all,

implementing the RDF mapping, I'm also implementing the creation of the
fragment identifiers and I found the following small (maybe editorial)
problems in Appendix C:

1) the canonical form does not say that no xmlns() pointer part should
define the namespace same as the namespace of the WSDL 2.0 document, so
it doesn't seem that the following would be uncanonical, while it should
be:
http://example.com/wsdl#
    xmlns(ns1=http://example.com/wsdl#)
    wsdl.interfaceFaultReference(iface/op/In/ns1:Foo)

2) example c-2 has a typo, it declares namespace prefix ns1 but uses
xsTicketAgent in the fifth IRI

Jacek