Re: Final WSDL 2.0 document tweaks
Arthur Ryman <[email protected]> Fri, 22 Jun 2007 16:54:52 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.services.description |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <OF5C0598CC.777818CE-ON85257302.007286E6-85257302.0072E376@ca.ibm.com> |
This is a multipart message in MIME format. --=_alternative 007289AD85257302_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1 Arthur Ryman, PhD, AoT, DE Process and Portfolio Management, Rational Division phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077 assistant: +1-905-413-3831 (T/L: 318-8867) fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920 mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: [email protected] "Jonathan Marsh" <[email protected]>=20 Sent by: [email protected] 06/20/2007 06:01 PM To "'WS-Description WG'" <[email protected]> cc Subject Final WSDL 2.0 document tweaks The call for review of the WSDL 2.0 documents ends today! If you haven?t=20 yet voted, get your AC rep on the phone right away! =20 In looking at the issues raised on this list during the PR period, I=20 propose we resolve them as follows. Since these are fairly trivial=20 matters, I don?t think we need a telcon for them if nobody objects to my=20 proposed resolutions. =20 1) Jacek proposed a clarification at [1]. This looks like a reasonable=20 editorial clarification, and I propose we accept his proposed resolution=20 and incorporate it into the Rec draft. =20 2) Jacek also asks for some RDDL/RDF for our non-namespace URIs at [2]. I = believe Philippe has prepared simple RDDL documents for these URIs per W3C = policy, but it?s not clear to me what RDF should accompany the RDDL, nor=20 who would write it. Because it?s easy to add RDF links to the RDDLs I=20 propose add this item to bugzilla for the future WS Core WG to address as=20 an errata (although since it?s not an issue against the Rec so it?s really = more of a work item.) =20 3) Bug 4590 [3] can be closed, as it's been fixed editorially. =20 4) Bug 4563 [4] looks like a quibble over wording ? the behavior doesn?t=20 seem to be in question. I think it is harmless to leave this one open as=20 a potential errata for the future WS Core WG.=20 =20 So, if nobody disagrees with these resolutions by the end of business this = week, I?ll ask the editors and Philippe to act accordingly and we should=20 be able to see a Recommendation publication before our charter expires=20 next week. =20 [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2007May/0042.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2007May/0044.html [3] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show=5Fbug.cgi?id=3D4590 [4] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show=5Fbug.cgi?id=3D4563 =20 =20 Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com -=20 http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com =20 --=_alternative 007289AD85257302_= Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">+1</font> <br> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">Arthur Ryman, PhD, AoT, DE<br> Process and Portfolio Management, Rational Division<br> <br> phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077<br> assistant: +1-905-413-3831 (T/L: 318-8867)<br> fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920<br> mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: [email protected]</font> <br> <br> <br> <table width=3D100%> <tr valign=3Dtop> <td width=3D40%><font size=3D1 face=3D"sans-serif"><b>"Jonathan Marsh&= quot; <[email protected]></b> </font> <br><font size=3D1 face=3D"sans-serif">Sent by: [email protected]<= /font> <p><font size=3D1 face=3D"sans-serif">06/20/2007 06:01 PM</font> <td width=3D59%> <table width=3D100%> <tr valign=3Dtop> <td> <div align=3Dright><font size=3D1 face=3D"sans-serif">To</font></div> <td><font size=3D1 face=3D"sans-serif">"'WS-Description WG'" <= [email protected]></font> <tr valign=3Dtop> <td> <div align=3Dright><font size=3D1 face=3D"sans-serif">cc</font></div> <td> <tr valign=3Dtop> <td> <div align=3Dright><font size=3D1 face=3D"sans-serif">Subject</font></div> <td><font size=3D1 face=3D"sans-serif">Final WSDL 2.0 document tweaks</font= ></table> <br> <table> <tr valign=3Dtop> <td> <td></table> <br></table> <br> <br> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">The call for review of the WSDL 2.0 documents ends today! If you haven’t yet voted, get your AC rep on the phone right away!</font> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif"> </font> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">In looking at the issues raised on t= his list during the PR period, I propose we resolve them as follows. Since these are fairly trivial matters, I don’t think we need a telcon for = them if nobody objects to my proposed resolutions.</font> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif"> </font> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">1) Jacek proposed a clarification at [1]. This looks like a reasonable editorial clarification, and I propose we accept his proposed resolution and incorporate it into the Rec draft.</font> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif"> </font> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">2) Jacek also asks for some RDDL/RDF for our non-namespace URIs at [2]. I believe Philippe has prepared simple RDDL documents for these URIs per W3C policy, but it’s not cle= ar to me what RDF should accompany the RDDL, nor who would write it. Bec= ause it’s easy to add RDF links to the RDDLs I propose add this item to bu= gzilla for the future WS Core WG to address as an errata (although since it’s not an issue against the Rec so it’s really more of a work item.)</fo= nt> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif"> </font> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">3) Bug 4590 [3] can be closed, as it= 's been fixed editorially.</font> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif"> </font> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">4) Bug 4563 [4] looks like a quibble over wording – the behavior doesn’t seem to be in question. &nb= sp;I think it is harmless to leave this one open as a potential errata for the future WS Core WG. </font> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif"> </font> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">So, if nobody disagrees with these r= esolutions by the end of business this week, I’ll ask the editors and Philippe to act accordingly and we should be able to see a Recommendation publication before our charter expires next week.</font> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif"> </font> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">[1] </font><a href=3D"http://lists.w= 3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2007May/0042.html"><font size=3D2 color= =3Dblue face=3D"sans-serif"><u>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-d= esc/2007May/0042.html</u></font></a> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">[2] </font><a href=3D"http://lists.w= 3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2007May/0044.html"><font size=3D2 color= =3Dblue face=3D"sans-serif"><u>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-d= esc/2007May/0044.html</u></font></a> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">[3] </font><a href=3D"http://www.w3.= org/Bugs/Public/show=5Fbug.cgi?id=3D4590"><font size=3D2 color=3Dblue face= =3D"sans-serif"><u>http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show=5Fbug.cgi?id=3D4590</= u></font></a> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">[4] </font><a href=3D"http://www.w3.= org/Bugs/Public/show=5Fbug.cgi?id=3D4563"><font size=3D2 color=3Dblue face= =3D"sans-serif"><u>http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show=5Fbug.cgi?id=3D4563</= u></font></a> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif"> </font> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif"> </font> <br><font size=3D2 face=3D"Verdana"><b>Jonathan Marsh</b></font><font size= =3D2 color=3D#81c097 face=3D"Verdana"> - </font><a href=3Dhttp://www.wso2.com/><font size=3D2 color=3D#81c097 face= =3D"Verdana"><u>http://www.wso2.com</u></font></a><font size=3D2 color=3D#8= 1c097 face=3D"Verdana"> - </font><a href=3Dhttp://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com/><font size=3D2 col= or=3D#81c097 face=3D"Verdana"><u>http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com</u></= font></a> <br><font size=3D3 face=3D"Times New Roman"> </font> <br> --=_alternative 007289AD85257302_=--