Re: Final WSDL 2.0 document tweaks

Arthur Ryman <[email protected]> Fri, 22 Jun 2007 16:54:52 -0400
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.services.description
Message-ID <OF5C0598CC.777818CE-ON85257302.007286E6-85257302.0072E376@ca.ibm.com>
This is a multipart message in MIME format.
--=_alternative 007289AD85257302_=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

+1

Arthur Ryman, PhD, AoT, DE
Process and Portfolio Management, Rational Division

phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077
assistant: +1-905-413-3831 (T/L: 318-8867)
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: [email protected]



"Jonathan Marsh" <[email protected]>=20
Sent by: [email protected]
06/20/2007 06:01 PM

To
"'WS-Description WG'" <[email protected]>
cc

Subject
Final WSDL 2.0 document tweaks






The call for review of the WSDL 2.0 documents ends today!  If you haven?t=20
yet voted, get your AC rep on the phone right away!
=20
In looking at the issues raised on this list during the PR period, I=20
propose we resolve them as follows.  Since these are fairly trivial=20
matters, I don?t think we need a telcon for them if nobody objects to my=20
proposed resolutions.
=20
1) Jacek proposed a clarification at [1].  This looks like a reasonable=20
editorial clarification, and I propose we accept his proposed resolution=20
and incorporate it into the Rec draft.
=20
2) Jacek also asks for some RDDL/RDF for our non-namespace URIs at [2].  I =

believe Philippe has prepared simple RDDL documents for these URIs per W3C =

policy, but it?s not clear to me what RDF should accompany the RDDL, nor=20
who would write it.  Because it?s easy to add RDF links to the RDDLs I=20
propose add this item to bugzilla for the future WS Core WG to address as=20
an errata (although since it?s not an issue against the Rec so it?s really =

more of a work item.)
=20
3) Bug 4590 [3] can be closed, as it's been fixed editorially.
=20
4) Bug 4563 [4] looks like a quibble over wording ? the behavior doesn?t=20
seem to be in question.  I think it is harmless to leave this one open as=20
a potential errata for the future WS Core WG.=20
=20
So, if nobody disagrees with these resolutions by the end of business this =

week, I?ll ask the editors and Philippe to act accordingly and we should=20
be able to see a Recommendation publication before our charter expires=20
next week.
=20
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2007May/0042.html
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2007May/0044.html
[3] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show=5Fbug.cgi?id=3D4590
[4] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show=5Fbug.cgi?id=3D4563
=20
=20
Jonathan Marsh - http://www.wso2.com -=20
http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com
=20

--=_alternative 007289AD85257302_=
Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">+1</font>
<br>
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">Arthur Ryman, PhD, AoT, DE<br>
Process and Portfolio Management, Rational Division<br>
<br>
phone: +1-905-413-3077, TL 969-3077<br>
assistant: +1-905-413-3831 (T/L: 318-8867)<br>
fax: +1-905-413-4920, TL 969-4920<br>
mobile: +1-416-939-5063, text: [email protected]</font>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<table width=3D100%>
<tr valign=3Dtop>
<td width=3D40%><font size=3D1 face=3D"sans-serif"><b>&quot;Jonathan Marsh&=
quot;
&lt;[email protected]&gt;</b> </font>
<br><font size=3D1 face=3D"sans-serif">Sent by: [email protected]<=
/font>
<p><font size=3D1 face=3D"sans-serif">06/20/2007 06:01 PM</font>
<td width=3D59%>
<table width=3D100%>
<tr valign=3Dtop>
<td>
<div align=3Dright><font size=3D1 face=3D"sans-serif">To</font></div>
<td><font size=3D1 face=3D"sans-serif">&quot;'WS-Description WG'&quot; &lt;=
[email protected]&gt;</font>
<tr valign=3Dtop>
<td>
<div align=3Dright><font size=3D1 face=3D"sans-serif">cc</font></div>
<td>
<tr valign=3Dtop>
<td>
<div align=3Dright><font size=3D1 face=3D"sans-serif">Subject</font></div>
<td><font size=3D1 face=3D"sans-serif">Final WSDL 2.0 document tweaks</font=
></table>
<br>
<table>
<tr valign=3Dtop>
<td>
<td></table>
<br></table>
<br>
<br>
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">The call for review of the WSDL 2.0
documents ends today! &nbsp;If you haven&#8217;t yet voted, get your AC rep
on the phone right away!</font>
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">&nbsp;</font>
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">In looking at the issues raised on t=
his
list during the PR period, I propose we resolve them as follows. &nbsp;Since
these are fairly trivial matters, I don&#8217;t think we need a telcon for =
them
if nobody objects to my proposed resolutions.</font>
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">&nbsp;</font>
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">1) Jacek proposed a clarification at
[1]. &nbsp;This looks like a reasonable editorial clarification, and I
propose we accept his proposed resolution and incorporate it into the Rec
draft.</font>
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">&nbsp;</font>
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">2) Jacek also asks for some RDDL/RDF
for our non-namespace URIs at [2]. &nbsp;I believe Philippe has prepared
simple RDDL documents for these URIs per W3C policy, but it&#8217;s not cle=
ar
to me what RDF should accompany the RDDL, nor who would write it. &nbsp;Bec=
ause
it&#8217;s easy to add RDF links to the RDDLs I propose add this item to bu=
gzilla
for the future WS Core WG to address as an errata (although since it&#8217;s
not an issue against the Rec so it&#8217;s really more of a work item.)</fo=
nt>
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">&nbsp;</font>
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">3) Bug 4590 [3] can be closed, as it=
's
been fixed editorially.</font>
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">&nbsp;</font>
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">4) Bug 4563 [4] looks like a quibble
over wording &#8211; the behavior doesn&#8217;t seem to be in question. &nb=
sp;I think
it is harmless to leave this one open as a potential errata for the future
WS Core WG. </font>
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">&nbsp;</font>
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">So, if nobody disagrees with these r=
esolutions
by the end of business this week, I&#8217;ll ask the editors and Philippe to
act accordingly and we should be able to see a Recommendation publication
before our charter expires next week.</font>
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">&nbsp;</font>
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">[1] </font><a href=3D"http://lists.w=
3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2007May/0042.html"><font size=3D2 color=
=3Dblue face=3D"sans-serif"><u>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-d=
esc/2007May/0042.html</u></font></a>
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">[2] </font><a href=3D"http://lists.w=
3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2007May/0044.html"><font size=3D2 color=
=3Dblue face=3D"sans-serif"><u>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-d=
esc/2007May/0044.html</u></font></a>
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">[3] </font><a href=3D"http://www.w3.=
org/Bugs/Public/show=5Fbug.cgi?id=3D4590"><font size=3D2 color=3Dblue face=
=3D"sans-serif"><u>http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show=5Fbug.cgi?id=3D4590</=
u></font></a>
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">[4] </font><a href=3D"http://www.w3.=
org/Bugs/Public/show=5Fbug.cgi?id=3D4563"><font size=3D2 color=3Dblue face=
=3D"sans-serif"><u>http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show=5Fbug.cgi?id=3D4563</=
u></font></a>
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">&nbsp;</font>
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"sans-serif">&nbsp;</font>
<br><font size=3D2 face=3D"Verdana"><b>Jonathan Marsh</b></font><font size=
=3D2 color=3D#81c097 face=3D"Verdana">
- </font><a href=3Dhttp://www.wso2.com/><font size=3D2 color=3D#81c097 face=
=3D"Verdana"><u>http://www.wso2.com</u></font></a><font size=3D2 color=3D#8=
1c097 face=3D"Verdana">
- </font><a href=3Dhttp://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com/><font size=3D2 col=
or=3D#81c097 face=3D"Verdana"><u>http://auburnmarshes.spaces.live.com</u></=
font></a>
<br><font size=3D3 face=3D"Times New Roman">&nbsp;</font>
<br>
--=_alternative 007289AD85257302_=--