Re: WSDL example at http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl

This is one of many known errors in the spec. Keep in mind that the
WSDL 1.1spec is a W3C Note, not a vetted standard (known as a
Recommendation in W3C
parlance). There is no plan to update the WSDL 1.1 spec to correct its many
errors. The WSDL Working Group is developing WSDL 2.0.

Anne

On 12/20/05, Jesper Sørensen <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>  I am currently digging into Web Service and was reading the :
>
>
>
> Web Services Description Language (WSDL) 1.1
>
> W3C Note 15 March 2001
>
>
>
> at  http://www.w3.org/TR/wsdl
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> In example 1 :   *Example 1 SOAP 1.1 Request/Response via HTTP*
>
>
>
> The Service definition, at the end of the example, points to a Binding
> called "*StockQuoteBinding*" :
>
>
>
> <service name="*StockQuoteService*">
>
>      <documentation>My first service</documentation>
>
>      <port name="StockQuotePort" binding="tns:*StockQuoteBinding*">
>
>           <soap:address location="http://example.com/stockquote"/<http://example.com/stockquote%22/>
> >
>
>      </port>
>
> </service>
>
>
>
>
>
> But in the definition of bindings only a "*StockQuoteSoapBinding*" exist :
>
>
>
>     <binding name="*StockQuoteSoapBinding*" type="tns:StockQuotePortType">
>
>         <soap:binding style="document" transport="
> http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http"/<http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http%22/>
> >
>
>         <operation name="GetLastTradePrice">
>
>            <soap:operation soapAction="
> http://example.com/GetLastTradePrice"/<http://example.com/GetLastTradePrice%22/>
> >
>
>            <input>
>
>                <soap:body use="literal"/>
>
>            </input>
>
>            <output>
>
>                <soap:body use="literal"/>
>
>            </output>
>
>         </operation>
>
>     </binding>
>
>
>
>
>
> Is it just me or should it have been *StockQuoteSoapBinding *that was to
> referenced In the Service Definition "StockQuoteService" ?????
>
>
>
> Regards
>
> Jesper
>