Re: Where to report errata in published specs?
Christopher B Ferris <[email protected]> Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:21:12 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.services.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <OFE0D175E3.B2353FAA-ON85257234.0048FA77-85257234.00495973@us.ibm.com> |
W3C does not maintain the WSDL1.1 specification. I would suggest a look at
the
WS-I profiles, as they have addressed most of the errata for SOAP1.1 and
WSDL1.1.
http://ws-i.org/
Cheers,
Christopher Ferris
STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy
email: [email protected]
blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/chrisferris
phone: +1 508 377 9295
[email protected] wrote on 11/24/2006 09:19:42 AM:
> Hello!
>
> After much hair pulling attempting to get a certain WSDL test
> scenario to work, I realized that there is a substantial error in
> the WSDL 1.1 specification/technical report.
>
> In numerous cases in the document, the service-to-port binding:
>
> <service name="StockQuoteService">
> <documentation>My first service</documentation>
> <port name="StockQuotePort" binding="tns:
> StockQuoteBinding">
> <soap:address location="http:
> //example.com/stockquote"/>
> </port>
> </service>
>
> ?should actually be?.
>
> <service name="StockQuoteService">
> <documentation>My first service</documentation>
> <port name="StockQuotePort" binding="tns:
> StockQuoteSoapBinding">
> <soap:address location="http:
> //example.com/stockquote"/>
> </port>
> </service>
>
> Note the change from ?StockQuoteBinding? to ?StockQuoteSoapBinding?.
>
> To whom should this be reported?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Rick Bullotta
> SAP Labs, LLC