Re: [rest-discuss] request to register 'describes' link relation (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wilde-describes-link-01)
Erik Wilde <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.apps-discuss,gmane.comp.web.services.rest |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
hello nathan. On 2012-10-09 13:21 , Nathan wrote: > Looks good and most useful, is it worth mentioning anywhere that this > inverse relations(describes being the inverse of describedby) is now > needed due to @rev falling out of fashion? It may help explain why > describes wasn't defined by powder in the first instance. honestly, i think such a comment would probably confuse more people than it would help. @rev never was a popular idea to begin with and only part of relatively few vocabularies. cheers, dret. -- erik wilde | mailto:[email protected] - tel:+1-510-2061079 | | UC Berkeley - School of Information (ISchool) | | http://dret.net/netdret http://twitter.com/dret |