Re: URI design, part 2

hello max.

On 2012-12-01 08:17 , Max Toro wrote:
> Thanks for you answer Erik. I don't want to repeat myself, so please
> see my answer to Eric, I'd love to get your comments as well. Rather
> than good or bad I'd like to determine if my example is REST or not.

i guess most people agree that the only reasonable answer to a question 
such as "is URI X RESTful" is: "tell me more about your design."

i'd like to get one tiny bit of clarification from you: when saying you 
have a resource X/operation, did you choose "cancel" on purpose as 
something that could be mapped to a DELETE X fairly easily, or do you 
also consider something such as X/additem, where the hypothetical 
operation would not delete the resource, but change its status outside 
of the CRUD realm?

thanks,

dret.