Re: Media Type for resource archives
Craig McClanahan <[email protected]> Fri, 10 Jan 2014 17:59:23 -0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.services.rest |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CANgkmLCVwH9KO1s3to3zEUnChKEW0WRLYovKOOXMS=9t-HSvpA@mail.gmail.com> |
We (Jive) use the multipart/form-data in lots of use cases, such as uploading a document (with a well defined JSON format) plus some associated attachments. However, we don't enforce a requirement that the JSON data be the first body part -- instead, we search through the available body parts for it with some well-defined heuristics, and treat all the other body parts as attachments. Craig McClanahan On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Jan Algermissen <[email protected] > wrote: > > > Hi, > > I am thinking about a media type for bundling together a bunch of > resources[1] into a single file. With these files I want to store a > manifest file. > > One option would be to just use a zip-based format and an manifest file > with a well known name. > > The problem with this is that useful stream processing of such a file can > only be done by ensuring that the manifest is the first entry when > unzipping. Apparently it requires some stunts to control the ordering of > the zip entries and who knows whether the other end uses a compatible > implementation. > > Solution would be to unpack to disk first and go from there. Not nice. > > A possible alternative would be to use a multipart format where I can > simply require the manifest to be the first part. Then just zip that file > or rely on transfer encoding to reduce the bytes on the wire. > > Nice things about that: > - Ordering is guaranteed > - Full support for per-part MIME headers > - Content-Length enables fast splitting of the parts > - cid: URIs make for natural, standard URI-references inside the file > - stream processing without temporary storage > > I am interested in reactions to the two alternatives or any ideas beyond > that. > > Jan > > [1] Well, obviously their entities at some point in time > >