Re: Atom entries for change events of resources (looking for appropriate link relation)
Jan Algermissen <[email protected]> Mon, 13 Jan 2014 00:49:49 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.services.rest |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 13.01.2014, at 00:35, Erik Mogensen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Jan Algermissen <[email protected]> wrote: > [...] > What I am looking for is a link relation that is a good fit for linking from the entry to the changed resources. I am thinking > > - about: <link rel="about" href="/employees/7628827272"/> > - via: <link rel="via" href="/employees/7628827272"/> > [...] > > About stands out as a clear winner IMHO. > > "Employee 12345"... is the subject of ..."this change event" Yes, I like that, too. Especially vs minting one. OTH, there is the proximity to RDF/Linked Data semantics. > > FWIW, Mark Nottingham's awesome cache channels draft[1] from 2007 used the alternate link relation (top of page 7): > > Entries in the feed represent events, in reverse-chronological order. > The atom:link element(s) with the "alternate" relation determines the > URI(s) that an event is applicable to. > > Thanks for reminding me. I kinda think 'alternate' means 'can stand in as' which is not true in my case. Ian S. Robinson also used alternate in hist Infoq talk. Jan > > [1]: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-http-cache-channels-01#page-7 > > -- > -mogsie- >