Re: Atom entries for change events of resources (looking for appropriate link relation)

Jan Algermissen <[email protected]> Mon, 13 Jan 2014 00:49:49 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.services.rest
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 13.01.2014, at 00:35, Erik Mogensen <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 10:08 PM, Jan Algermissen <[email protected]> wrote:
> [...]
> What I am looking for is a link relation that is a good fit for linking from the entry to the changed resources. I am thinking
> 
> - about: <link rel="about" href="/employees/7628827272"/>
> - via: <link rel="via" href="/employees/7628827272"/>
> [...]
> 
> About stands out as a clear winner IMHO.
> 
> "Employee 12345"... is the subject of ..."this change event"

Yes, I like that, too. Especially vs minting one. OTH, there is the proximity to RDF/Linked Data semantics.
> 
> FWIW, Mark Nottingham's awesome cache channels draft[1] from 2007 used the alternate link relation (top of page 7):
> 
>    Entries in the feed represent events, in reverse-chronological order.
>    The atom:link element(s) with the "alternate" relation determines the
>    URI(s) that an event is applicable to.
> 
> 

Thanks for reminding me. I kinda think 'alternate' means 'can stand in as' which is not true in my case. Ian S. Robinson also used alternate in hist Infoq talk.
 
Jan

> 
> [1]: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-http-cache-channels-01#page-7
> 
> -- 
> -mogsie-
>