Re: Reliable Messaging: Division of Responsibilities (was RE: REST, C onversations and Reliability)

Mark Baker <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.services.ws-arch
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Dave,

On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 10:51:08AM -0700, Dave Hollander wrote:
> The REST, Conversations and reliability thread has been
> informative. I am splitting out what I believe to be one of the
> key design issues to come from it in hopes of focusing and
> progressing to a useful architecture document.

Good idea.

> *If* we assume that the view that applications must share *some*
> responsibility for reliability, then I think our task is to add
> as many semantics and formalized processes to access and manage
> these semantics.

Can you elaborate on what you mean by that?  I don't understand.

MB
-- 
Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred)
Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.               [email protected]
http://www.markbaker.ca        http://www.idokorro.com
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.