Re: Choreography and REST
"Christopher B Ferris" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.services.ws-arch |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Paul Prescod wrote: <snip/> > I claim that if Web Services people presumed a writable Web was > available to all services, and thought throough the implications of > that, the idea of a choreography language would not even occur to us. > CORBA obviously is not REST but I would be curious to hear whether CORBA > people feel they need a "choreography language". If so, I'm no familiar > with it. Why isn't this a central part of CORBA? Because CORBA presumes > a shared writable (object) information space. <snip/> Actually, the OMG (aka CORBA people) do feel they need a "choreography language". It's called EDOC[1]. It is needed for many of the same reasons as Geoff cites in one of his responses to this thread (e.g. the trend towards public v private semantics). Cheers, Christopher Ferris Architect, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture email: [email protected] phone: +1 508 234 3624 [1] http://www.dstc.edu.au/Research/Projects/EDOC/submission1.pdf