Re: Choreography and REST

Paul Prescod <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.services.ws-arch
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Christopher B Ferris wrote:
> 
> You need to drill down a bit further than the one-sentence description
> 
> of EDOC.
> 
> I never claimed that EDOC-the-whole-thing is exclusively JUST about
> choreography of process and hence can be equated to WSCI at some
> level.
> However, business process is at the heart of what is needed to model
> enterprise
> distributed computing.

I agree that business process is key as a problem domain. We are talking
about the specific technology of choreography specifications. I do not
feel that these are proper *technical solutions* to the *business
problem* of business process description. Merely correlating client and
server states in a state machine only solves the part of the problem
that you *cause* if you refuse to make those states explicit on the wire
and in URI-addressable resources. If you design the service so that
states are explicit and addressable then you are freed to concentrate on
the larger problems (as it seems EDOC is).
-- 
"When I walk on the floor for the final execution, I'll wear a denim 
suit. I'll walk in there like Willie Nelson, John Wayne, Will Smith 
-- Men in Black -- James Brown. Maybe do a Michael Jackson moonwalk."
Congressman James Traficant.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.