Re: Choreography and the Semantic Web

"Christopher B Ferris" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.services.ws-arch
Message-ID <OF00097848.A441BBAA-ON85256C13.005338A4-85256C13.005F5FE2@rchland.ibm.com>
Please see below.

Cheers,

Christopher Ferris
Architect, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
email: [email protected]
phone: +1 508 234 3624

Mark Baker <[email protected]> wrote on 08/12/2002 11:01:34 AM:

> On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 09:45:38AM -0400, Christopher B Ferris wrote:
> > 
> > Mark, 
> > 
> > And there is much that SOAP/WSDL do that RDF doesn't. 
> 
> Yes, but very little of it is necessary when you don't have a priori
> knowledge of the type of service you're interacting with, as the Web
> presumes.

I won't even bother to comment on this but to say of course it is, it's
just displaced.

> 
> SOAP/WSDL, in common use, presupposes that when the code is written,
> it knows the difference between a thermometer and a television.  REST
> does not.

REST has nothing to do with it. SOAP itself doesn't know the difference 
between
a television and a thermometer. Neither do WSDL or XML Schema. It is the
application which "knows" the difference, whether the semantics are baked 
into the code or inferred at runtime. 

> 
> > There is NOTHING that prevents one from using RDF in the context of 
Web 
> > services technologies (e.g. carrying RDF graphs in the SOAP header or
> > body, 
> > extending WSDL with RDF, or even representing a WSDL description using 

> > RDF), or not as one sees fit. 
> 
> There's nothing that *prevents* RDF from being used with SOAP/WSDL, but
> as I said, the earlier form of binding with SOAP/WSDL makes RDF
> unnecessary (note, this is a *bad* thing 8-).

To which earlier form of binding are you referring? Note there is a 
distinct
difference between being unnecessary and [ex|pre]cluded. Are you 
suggesting that
use of RDF is/was at anytime [ex|pre]cluded? I believe that for some,
the fact that RDF was/is unnecessary is considered to be a "good 
thing(tm)". For 
others, the fact that RDF is or could be supported is a "good thing(tm)".
Providing for both approaches is a "good thing(tm)". Excluding either 
would
be a mistake.

This is the balance we seek.

> 
> MB
> --
> Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred)
> Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.               [email protected]
> http://www.markbaker.ca        http://www.idokorro.com
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.