RE: Web service definition
"Brian Connell" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.services.ws-arch |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> I'm not comfortable with the use of the term 'component'. > I believe that the WG has expressed similar concern quite frequently. > I'd suggest that we leave it as 'application' for now. I'm equally uncomfortable with both 'application' and 'component'. Both suggest a possibility of a plurality of services. A better word would be more akin to 'method' meaning 'invocable software function', as this implies one service. What's the alternatives? There must be something better that a definition that starts with 'A Web Service is a software application ....'. Can I suggest 'A Web Service is a software function ...' or 'A Web Service represents business logic ...' IMHO, the second is better as it distinguishes between a representation of business logic, and the logic itself. Brian Connell CTO, WestGlobal