Re: "Orchestration" and "Choreography"

"Sanjiva Weerawarana" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.services.ws-arch
Message-ID <00ae01c24460$ec53cfa0$08aa7cca@lankabook2>
Hi Ugo,

The future work section lists "service composition" ... by which
we meant future work on global models. I agree its somewhat a poor
choice of words.

Sanjiva.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ugo Corda" <[email protected]>
To: "'Sanjiva Weerawarana'" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 2:55 AM
Subject: RE: "Orchestration" and "Choreography"


> 
> Hi Sanjiva,
> I quickly checked Chapter 13, Future Directions, but I don't see any
> reference to future work on a global model.
> 
> If I missed it, please let me know where it talks about it. This is
> important to understand BPEL's future direction.
> 
> Thank you,
> Ugo
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 14, 2002 1:45 PM
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: "Orchestration" and "Choreography"
> 
> 
> 
> Hi Edwin,
> 
> > I am a little confused: Aren't "abstract BPEL 
> > processes" suppose to represent business protocols 
> > and provide a global model?
> 
> No! They represent in some sense the projection of a global
> model to one partner. That is, effectively the public
> process or interface of the service in terms of order of
> execution etc..
> 
> I believe global models work is listed in the BPEL doc
> as future work, but I may be mistaken.
> 
> Sanjiva.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.