Re: More definitions / models of collaboration and orchestration to look at?

I'm afraid much of the material about BPEL in the review at
http://www.ebpml.org/bpel4ws.htm is incorrect IMO. Unfortunately I
don't have time to go thru and point them out right now (and I'm
taking a few days off next week), so hopefully some of the other
BPEL4WS authors will oblige. I'll be back by the time his "full
report" comes out on the 24th.

Bye,

Sanjiva.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ugo Corda" <[email protected]>
To: "'Champion, Mike'" <[email protected]>;
<[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2002 2:07 AM
Subject: RE: More definitions / models of collaboration and orchestration to
look at?


>
> Mike,
> I haven't read these papers either, but they are probably of interest to
us.
>
> One thing to keep in mind, though, is that his model and definitions might
> be different than the ones expressed in WSCI and BPEL (of which
Jean-Jacques
> Dubray has been a critical reviewer: see http://www.ebpml.org/wsci.htm and
> http://www.ebpml.org/bpel4ws.htm).
>
> Ugo
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Champion, Mike [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 11:59 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: More definitions / models of collaboration and orchestration to
> look at?
>
>
>
>
> This may or may not be of interest; I haven't read it yet ...
> >From http://webservices.org/index.php/article/articleview/594/1/1/
>
> "Jean-Jacques Dubray has published a couple papers that provide a new
model
> for "Multi-party collaboration" and "Business Process Definition"
>
> The papers are:
>
>
> 1) Multi-party collaboration http://www.ebpml.org/ebpml.doc
>
> 2) Business Process Definition: http://www.ebpml.org/ebpml2.2.doc
>
> These models are both based on the semantics and the ebXML BPSS
> specification (http://www.ebxml.org/specs/ebBPSS.pdf) which have been
> modified to be able to compose web service operations and ebXML business
> transactions within the same framework."