Re: Proposal re REST and Arch doc

Geoff,

I'm all for other names for the section, but I think that adding
additional architectures is quite an additional burden on the group.
We have a specific charter directive to "integrate cleanly" with Web
architecture, which is why I think keeping this section focused on it
would be healthy.

If the group wants to take on that extra effort, that's fine with me,
and I would even be happy to help out.  But it is a substantial amount
of work.

Thanks.

MB

On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 01:41:01PM -0400, Geoff Arnold wrote:
> is orthodoxy, let's document some tolerated heresies". How
> about entitling the section "Alternative Interaction State
> Paradigms" (ah, that lovely weasel-word!), with at least four
> subsections:
> - REST
> - OMA
> - Asynchronous/dynamic
> - Other
> 
> And before you protest that we haven't clearly identified what might
> go into the third or fourth section, I believe that this omission 
> will be
> shortly corrected. In the mean time, I'd like to drive a stake into the
> ground for a multiplicity of ideas - not just REST and "deviations".
> 
> Geoff
> 

-- 
Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred)
Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.               [email protected]
http://www.markbaker.ca        http://www.idokorro.com