Re: Proposal re REST and Arch doc

That's ok too, but it doesn't achieve what I want to achieve;
documenting the *differences*.

Is that so controversial?

We could even call it "Integrating WSA with Web Architecture", just to
make reference to our charter.

MB

On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 11:30:40AM -0700, Francis McCabe wrote:
> Rather than a section on standard orthodoxies and heresies, it may be 
> better to have a section that highlights the `input base' ideas that the 
> WSA draws from. That way, you can point out the inheritances from REST, 
> OMA etc. in a way that isn't threatening.

MB
-- 
Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred)
Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.               [email protected]
http://www.markbaker.ca        http://www.idokorro.com