Re: Champions for Draft-status requirements?
Hugo Haas <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.services.ws-arch |
|---|---|
| Organization | World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
* Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) <[email protected]> [2002-08-22 12:40-0700] > Basically I'm willing to let it go and it seems to me that the sense of the > group is moving this way, with the exception that I am REALLY opposed to > letting go completely the subject of reliable messaging. If D-AC017 went > away there would be no mention of reliable messaging whatever in the > requirements, and I think that this would be very inappropriate given the > level of interest and priority that is widely put on this subject. So I am > basically proposing getting rid of D-AC017 but adding something specifically > about reliable messaging. Doesn't AC018, with its fairly large umbrella, cover reliable messaging? Regards, Hugo -- Hugo Haas - W3C mailto:[email protected] - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 350 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iQCVAwUBPWnrDaN/9WeKWvkNAQE9jQP9HQUYlDWUn8Am5l5a+Ndd82jFqx4mW4bx rCW0XLDda5ehJKqp9etnOjfu3KM7Fqo6Rt5piCh8SKeZKllyldrR/dEOBZQRYpmJ pE3R2oOD5nISs+6yTrbmlF/aJWRZTHlYEhkRLxXU9n3l0M8nXXTpLcypwzUaTXr7 VE/J6tqhwsk= =yYJT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----