Re: Champions for Draft-status requirements? / D-AC017

Geoff Arnold <[email protected]> Wed, 28 Aug 2002 13:48:55 -0400

Newsgroups	gmane.comp.web.services.ws-arch
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On Wednesday, August 28, 2002, at 01:06  PM, Cutler, Roger 
(RogerCutler) wrote:

>  One of the solutions to this problem, I think, is to
> define reliable messaging a bit more accurately, for example by 
> replacing
> terms like "reliably exchange" (below) with something like "reduce the
> uncertainty of the message transmission to a practically acceptable 
> level".

The phrase "practically acceptable level" seems to be inviting trouble.
Why not simply talk about measurable reliability levels (i.e. QoS)?

Curious,

Geoff