RE: Proposal for D-AC017 (Business Functions)

Does that belong in the requirements doc?
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Hollander [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 6:06 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Proposal for D-AC017 (Business Functions)


I agree with the idea but would hope that reliable messaging would be
detailed
a bit...at least in terms of what it accomplishes. The thread by
David/Chris/et al
is what I had in mind.
 
daveH

-----Original Message-----
From: Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 2:25 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Proposal for D-AC017 (Business Functions)



D-AC017 currently reads: 

D-AC017 provides guidance for the development of the Web services
infrastructure needed to implement common business functions in a
standards-based environment.

D-AR017.1 The Web services Architecture must support common business
functions, to the extent that those functions are defined in similar
methodologies such as EDI.

D-AR017.2 The Web services Architecture must support reliable messaging and
routing. 

D-AR017.3 The Web services Architecture must support unique message IDs and
message sequencing. 

D-AR017.4 The Web services Architecture must support reliable transaction
processing. 

As "champion" of D-AC017 I propose that all of the above be dropped from the
Requirements Doc (but, of course, not the Usage Cases) and be replaced by a
single requirement:

The Web Services Architecture Working Group MUST address reliable messaging.