RE: arch diagrams from the f2f
"Sedukhin, Igor" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.services.ws-arch |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Mark, but how to you know about the URL to send HTTP GET? May be you called me over a phone or went to google search, right? That makes a logical operation of "publish", "find" using a discovery mechanism of choice. It can be P2P, like a port scan or it can be phone or what have you. Discovery is conceptually different than semantic interactions. That is what the triangle diagram captures. -- Igor Sedukhin .. ([email protected]) -- (631) 342-4325 .. 1 CA Plaza, Islandia, NY 11788 -----Original Message----- From: Mark Baker [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 9:26 PM To: Mark Jones Cc: Heather Kreger; [email protected] Subject: Re: arch diagrams from the f2f I wanted to say that the concern I raised about the triangle diagram - that it's logical, but may be interpreted as suggesting the existence of particular technologies - appears to be the case in Mark's slides (though at the f2f we appeared to have started down this path). I consider it a fundamental advance of the Web over previous distributed systems, that "publish" and "find" are integrated into "interact", all by virtue of the joined-at-the-hip relationship between a URI and the HTTP GET method. I suggest that we refrain from attempting to map specific technologies to this diagram for this reason. If we're going to do any mapping, we should have a separate physical diagram with which to do that. Thanks. MB -- Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred) Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. [email protected] http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.idokorro.com