RE: arch diagrams from the f2f

I am still concerned that these diagrams seem visually to restrict web
services to one messaging pattern.  No matter what the words might say in
the text, I think that having pictures that leave this impression would not
be good.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Jones [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 1:50 PM
To: Heather Kreger
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: arch diagrams from the f2f


Heather,

I  added 3 slides at the end of the set that you sent out.  I rearranged 
and simplified the boxes and labels a bit.  I also began to append 
concrete technology labels on some of the boxes.  (I just made a cursory 
pass at this to see what it would look like.  Feel free to further flesh 
it out.)  At least while we are deciding on the correct set of boxes and 
labels, I think it helps to identify them.

Mark Jones
AT&T
 

Heather Kreger wrote:

>
>
>
>Hi folks, Here are the architecture diagrams I drafted up during our 
>meeting today. I have some words for some of this stuff that I will 
>align and send to the group as soon as
>humanly possible.
>
>(See attached file: w3cStack.ppt)
>
>I have permission from IBM to submit both this stack and the origional 
>triangle to the W3C for inclusion into the architecture and 
>modification by the working group.
>
>Heather Kreger
>Web Services Lead Architect
>STSM, SWG Emerging Technology
>[email protected]
>919-543-3211 (t/l 441)  cell:919-496-9572
>