RE: Words for the Triangles
Ugo Corda <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.services.ws-arch |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Joel, Yes, I did not mean to imply that the replication mechanism had been abandoned. Ugo -----Original Message----- From: Munter, Joel D [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 1:46 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: Words for the Triangles ugo, uddi v3 still retains the notion that a (single) registry may be comprised of multiple (replicating) nodes. with uddi v3 we addressed the need for registry-to-registry communication. joel -----Original Message----- From: Ugo Corda [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 8:58 AM To: 'Hugo Haas'; [email protected] Subject: RE: Words for the Triangles >I think that UDDI hints at a central registry solution, and putting it >in a sentence such as "the key to reaching this new horizon is a >common program-to-program communication model" definitely pushes in >this direction. Version 3 of UDDI has moved away from the concept of a central registry. UDDI 3 supports multiregistry topologies (which is different than version 2's multinode topologies based on node replication). For more details, see UDDI 3 section 8, "Publishing Across Multiple Registries" [1]. Ugo [1] http://www.uddi.org/pubs/uddi-v3.00-published-20020719.htm#_Toc12653784