RE: Label for Top Node of "triangle diagram"

+1

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On
> Behalf Of Heather Kreger
> Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 2:14 PM
> To: Francis McCabe
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Label for Top Node of "triangle diagram"
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This is an interesting diagram in that in brings up some topics we haven't
> brought out yet... like explicitly calling out relationships as a layer,
> but it looks more like an architecture stack variation (like the
> ones we've
> been tacking on the triangle) and the relationship of thos stack levels
> to different technologies.
>
> I agree we need to do that and Mark and I exchanged some variations that
> added it.
>
> I think this diagram is sorta scarey as a very first chart, but something
> like it would be usefull later on in the discussion.
>
> I still feel like we need a simpler first diagram.
>
> The triangle is simple.  I don't think it confuses. I do think
> that it goes
> down MUCH better with some words. I don't think its possible to come up
> with a diagram that expresses the breadth of web services that
> doesn't need
> a few words. The other nice thing about the triangle is that its been
> around for a while as a intro to web services (not just from IBM) and many
> coming to this spec may feel comfortable seeing and thinking about
> it again.
>
> Heather Kreger
> Web Services Lead Architect
> STSM, SWG Emerging Technology
> [email protected]
> 919-543-3211 (t/l 441)  cell:919-496-9572
>
>
> Francis McCabe <[email protected]>@w3.org on 10/01/2002 12:14:39 PM
>
> Sent by:    [email protected]
>
>
> To:    Doug Bunting <[email protected]>
> cc:    [email protected]
> Subject:    Re: Label for Top Node of "triangle diagram"
>
>
>
> This is a resend of a diagram I sent out earlier.
>
> It is different kind of diagram to the triangle as it doesn't focus on
> the players in the game so much. However,  see my previous comments ;->
> Frank
>
>
>
>
>
>