Re: wire stack words and diagram

Hugo Haas <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.services.ws-arch
Organization World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
Message-ID <[email protected]>
* Jean-Jacques Moreau <[email protected]> [2002-10-01 15:37+0200]
> Heather,
> 
> Overall, this[0] looks good. I have some comments regarding the 
> SOAP description.
[..]

Excellent clarifications, Jean-Jacques.

> Heather Kreger wrote:
> >Here is the words I have for the wire stack.  Same caveats as before.
> >
> >(See attached file: wire.ZIP)
> 
> ---------------------
> "The current industry standard for XML packaging is the Simple 
> Object Access Protocol (SOAP)[SOAP 00]."
> 
>     Given that SOAP 1.2 is no longer an acronym (for which
>     no one has complained) -- and since I think you're really
>     talking about SOAP 1.1 at this point -- I'd suggest simply
>     saying: "SOAP 1.1 [SOAP 00]".
> 
> "IBM, Microsoft and others submitted SOAP to the W3C"
> 
>     s/SOAP/SOAP 1.1/
> 
> "as the basis of the XML Protocol Working Group [XMLP 00]."
> 
>     I suggest adding: "The XMLP WG is in the final stages of
>     developping SOAP 1.2, the next version of SOAP.", which
>     then provides a good transition to the following
>     (amended) sentence:
> 
> "Once complete, XML Protocol implementations will replace the 
> existing SOAP implementations as the industry standard XML 
> messaging protocol."
> 
>      s/XML Protocol/SOAP 1.2/  (The name of the protocol
>      is no longer XMLP [nor XP, as it used to be initially].)

I don't think that it is worth talking about SOAP 1.1 here. The work
on SOAP 1.2 is advanced enough to just replace the 1.1 prose by your
1.2 corrections.

Regards,

Hugo

-- 
Hugo Haas - W3C
mailto:[email protected] - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.