Re: Un-fogging the Top cloud in triangle/rectangle diagram

David Booth <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.services.ws-arch
Message-ID <5.1.0.14.2.20021008165630.0293f920@localhost>
Mike,

The discussion isn't about "what to call the top cloud", or "labeling the 
boxes".  The discussion is about whether a third party "Discovery Role" is 
needed AT ALL in the BASIC architecture, or "what boxes do we need".

I believe the BASIC architecture should only include architectural 
components that are clearly required for the vast majority of our 
anticipated applications.  Other components should go into an EXTENDED 
architecture.

I and others have shown several very commonly expected scenarios where (I 
believe) a "Discovery Role" is clearly irrelevant because the Service 
Requester already knows what Service Provider it wants to talk to.  Hence 
the discussion.

At 11:48 AM 10/8/2002 -0400, Champion, Mike wrote:


>I'm lost!  Could someone summarize the viable options that seem to be on the
>table, and let's have another email straw poll to get a sense of who can
>live with which names/conceptual descriptions for the "top cloud"?
>
>As much as this fascinates us :-) there are probably 40 or so more "boxes"
>we need to define in the WSA reference architecture, and at 2 weeks/box,
>we're going to exhaust a lot of people's patience :-)  At this point I think
>its OK (if not really desireable) to label it "the top cloud discovery /
>repository  role / service thing" and move on if we can't come to consensus
>in a day or so.
>
>Thanks!

-- 
David Booth
W3C Fellow / Hewlett-Packard
Telephone: +1.617.253.1273
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.