RE: remembering business data and taxonomy in description
Katia Sycara <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.services.ws-arch |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Mike, I do not promise quick results (I am on almost continuous travel for the next few weeks), but it would be interesting to try. David B. or anyone else that would like to be involved please let me know. --katia -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Champion, Mike Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2002 11:16 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: remembering business data and taxonomy in description > -----Original Message----- > From: Katia Sycara [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, October 19, 2002 9:30 AM > To: David Booth; Heather Kreger; [email protected] > Subject: RE: remembering business data and taxonomy in description > > > > +1! > I would be interested in helping define a WS ontology in OWL. > --Katia Starting with the current "triangle" framework" Or perhaps a subset of the concepts in WSCI? I would be very interested in seeing some sort of OWL or RDF formalization of something that we think we understand to see what it adds, how it could help us, etc. I'll preach the usual sermon about not being distracted for the next couple of weeks, but perhaps a demonstration of how "ontological thinking" can help us clarify the Web architecture and how choreography fits in could be very valuable.