Re: new editor's draft of WSA available

"Christopher B Ferris" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.services.ws-arch
Message-ID <OFB12333F5.92DFEA26-ON85256C5C.0053E2FC-85256C5C.005C79ED@rchland.ibm.com>
Jean-Jacques,

I have incorporated the first part of your comments. There was quite a bit
of material to incorporate, so I have placed your full set of unaddressed
comments on the editor's todo list.

New draft at same location:

 http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/arch/wsa/wd-wsa-arch.html

Cheers,

Christopher Ferris
Architect, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
email: [email protected]
phone: +1 508 234 3624

"Jean-Jacques Moreau" <[email protected]> wrote on 10/24/2002 06:03:55 
AM:

> Hi Chris,
> 
> On the same line, I think my SOAP comments[1] on Heather's 
> draft[2] were not addressed either...
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Jean-Jacques.
> 
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002Oct/0001.html
> [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-arch/2002Sep/0296.html
> 
> Christopher B Ferris wrote:
> > 
> > Joel,
> > 
> > Not ignored, but missed (by me). Appologies. I will look to 
incorporate 
> > these comments
> > in a subsequent draft.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> > Christopher Ferris
> > Architect, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
> > email: [email protected]
> > phone: +1 508 234 3624
> > 
> > Joel Munter wrote on 10/23/2002 02:04:33 PM:
> > 
> >  > Several weeks ago, I completed a review of Heather's draft 
"Discovery 
> > Words" before they were
> >  > incorporated into the WSA draft material.  I see in this latest 
> > publication that my suggestions
> >  > and comments were ignored and the issues that I addressed with my 
> > comments are still present.  I
> >  > have re-issue them here for your reference.  Please consider these 
> > comments.
> >  > 
> >  > Original Comments:
> >  > Portal UDDI Registry: The following sentence seems a touch awkward. 
"A
> >  > portal UDDI registry runs in the service provider's outside the 
> > firewall or
> >  > in a DMZ between firewalls." Please consider adding the word 
> > "environment"
> >  > between provider's and outside. There is the beginning of 
discussion of
> >  > "role-based" visibility here also. There is a similar capability 
that is
> >  > now defined within the UDDI specification itself and should be 
expected
> >  > within vendor-based tools and future registries.
> >  > 
> >  > This comment "...complete business context and well thought out 
> > taxonomies
> >  > are essential if the service is to be found be potential service
> >  > requestors..." which you have associated with just the [public] 
UDDI
> >  > Business Registry absolutely applies equally to all forms and 
usages of
> >  > registries.
> >  > 
> >  > Acquiring Service Descriptions: This statement "...Internal 
Enterprise
> >  > Application UDDI registries and Partner Catalog UDDI registries 
will 
> > require
> >  > no pre screening to establish trust of the service..." is not true. 
I 
> > might
> >  > host a web service within my enterprise and still need to establish 
a 
> > level
> >  > of working "trust" with (internal) users of the service.
> >  > 
> >  > I like to describe WSIL as getting a business card from someone 
that 
> > I have
> >  > already met or someone that I have been introduced to. The 
"business 
> > card"
> >  > provides a rich set of very specific information. If you agree with 
this
> >  > analogy, then you might want to add something to that affect.
> >  > 
> >  > Joel
> >  > 
> >  > 
> >  > -----Original Message-----
> >  > From: Christopher B Ferris [mailto:[email protected]]
> >  > Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 9:44 AM
> >  > To: [email protected]
> >  > Subject: new editor's draft of WSA available
> > 
> >  >
> >  > All,
> >  >
> >  > I've incorporated Eric and Heather's material with some tweaks. I 
> > have also included the harvesting
> >  > material as is (so we don't forget it:) I haven't included the 
> > management material as yet
> >  > because I understand that the MGT TF wants to noodle on that work 
> > some more before
> >  > they are ready to have it integrated (requiring a format change to 
> > XML). I believe that they
> >  > want to defer this until after the f2f.
> >  >
> >  > Anyway, here's the latest WSA:
> >  >
> >  > 
> > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/arch/wsa/wd-wsa-arch.html
> >  >
> >  > As always, comments welcomed. Note that I still need to update some 

> > of the graphics
> >  > to reflect naming changes we have (I think) settled on to a certain 

> > extent. Please let's
> >  > not get sucked into the vortex of endless debating over terms 
simply 
> > because I was
> >  > only able to find older representations of certain graphics. These 
> > will be updated!
> >  >
> >  > Remember, this is ONLY A DRAFT! :)
> >  >
> >  > Cheers,
> >  >
> >  > Christopher Ferris
> >  > Architect, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
> >  > email: [email protected]
> >  > phone: +1 508 234 3624
> >  > ----- Message from "Munter, Joel D" <[email protected]> on 
Thu, 
> > 26 Sep 2002 13:40:05 -0700 -----
> >  >
> >  > To:
> >  >
> >  > [email protected]
> >  >
> >  > Subject:
> >  >
> >  > RE: Discovery words
> >  >
> >  > Hi Heather,
> >  > Is this what you are intending for inclusion into the WSAWG spec? 
If 
> > so,
> >  > then please include it and let's just review one document.  I would 

> > like to
> >  > see the graphics.
> >  > Line numbers would help when providing comments.
> >  > While WSDL is absolutely preferred, there are other mechanisms for 
> > discovery
> >  > of a web service's methods and input and output parameters.  For 
> > instance,
> >  > Microsoft tools offer "reflection."  Maybe we should just state 
that 
> > WSDL is
> >  > preferred.
> >  > Portal UDDI Registry: The following sentence seems a touch awkward. 
 "A
> >  > portal UDDI registry runs in the service provider's outside the 
> > firewall or
> >  > in a DMZ between firewalls."  Please consider adding the word 
> > "environment"
> >  > between provider's and outside.  There is the beginning of 
discussion of
> >  > "role-based" visibility here also.  There is a similar capability 
> > that is
> >  > now defined within the UDDI specification itself and should be 
expected
> >  > within vendor-based tools and future registries.
> >  > 
> >  > This comment "...complete business context and well thought out 
> > taxonomies
> >  > are essential if the service is to be found be potential service
> >  > requestors..." which you have associated with just the [public] 
UDDI
> >  > Business Registry absolutely applies equally to all forms and 
usages of
> >  > registries.
> >  > Acquiring Service Descriptions: This statement "...Internal 
Enterprise
> >  > Application UDDI registries and Partner Catalog UDDI registries 
will 
> > require
> >  > no pre screening to establish trust of the service..." is not true. 

> >  I might
> >  > host a web service within my enterprise and still need to establish 
a 
> > level
> >  > of working "trust" with (internal) users of the service.
> >  > I like to describe WSIL as getting a business card from someone 
that 
> > I have
> >  > already met or someone that I have been introduced to.  The 
"business 
> > card"
> >  > provides a rich set of very specific information.  If you agree 
with 
> > this
> >  > analogy, then you might want to add something to that affect.
> >  > Joel
> >  >
> >  > -----Original Message-----
> >  > From: Heather Kreger [mailto:[email protected]]
> >  > Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 2:06 AM
> >  > To: [email protected]
> >  > Subject: Discovery words
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >
> >  >
> > 
> >  > Folks,
> >  > Here are the words I had for what I called the Registry Stack. I 
> > tried to
> >  > rename it to the Discovery Agency (I'm still uncomfortable with 
this
> >  > name... any other ideas?).  Again, these words are plaguerized from 

> > our Web
> >  > Services Conceptual Architecture paper 
(http://www.ibm.com/webservices,
> >  > click on resources and scroll down).  Of course this is just a 
starter
> >  > set...
> >  > (See attached file: HKsContribution.discoveryagency.htm)
> >  > Heather Kreger
> >  > Web Services Lead Architect
> >  > STSM, SWG Emerging Technology
> >  > [email protected]
> >  > 919-543-3211 (t/l 441)  cell:919-496-9572
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.