Re: Long owed Description stack words

"Jean-Jacques Moreau" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.services.ws-arch
Organization Canon Research Centre France
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Heather, Chris,

I have some comments on your recent addition to the Architecture 
document.

Jean-Jacques.

================

"(WSDL) is the de facto standard for XML based service description"

   I find it somewhat troublesome that a W3C WG (WSA)
   caracterizes what is now the work of another
   W3C WG (WSD) as "de facto standard". I know this is
   meant for WSDL 1.1, but I think we should also cater
   for WSDL 1.2.

"WSDL has been submitted to the W3C for standardization"

   It's not just been submitted, it is being actively
   worked on!

   Suggestion: add: "and is being worked on by the
   W3C Web Service Description WG."

"however, the only currently described bindings are for SOAP 1.1, 
HTTP POST, and MIME."

   Suggestion: change to: "WSDL 1.1 describes the following
   bindings: SOAP 1.1, HTTP POST and MIME. WSDL 1.2 will also
   describe a SOAP 1.2 binding."

"Think of an operation like a method signature in a programming 
language."

   The analogy is an over simplification and, IMO, leads the
   reader to think just in terms of RPCs instead of
   document-centric services.

"WSDL:message element is used to define the input and output 
parameters of an operation."

   Again, this is an RPC only description, IMO.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.