Re: Can we break Rule One? (was RE: Proposed Draft Charter for Choreo graphy WG)
bhaugen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.services.ws-arch |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <002701c289a0$72f18a00$b8eafea9@default> |
I suspect some possible misunderstandings and so will attempt to clarify a couple of facets of my recent messages and then will probably go back to lurking: 1. I am not suggesting ws-arch do a bunch of legal research or embed a bunch of legal rules into a choreography standard. Far from it. Be very very afraid. 2. I wasn't criticizing David Burdett's business example when I asked how much of it had been implemented by anybody. My point in both cases was that as far as I can tell, nobody has done much actual execution of complex multi-party business choreographies where actual legal commitments were involved. So when somebody says, "this is how EDI does it", I ask "did anybody ever automated it that way in EDI?" and the answer so far is invariably "no". Or when somebody says "this is how 'business' does it" and I ask "did anybody in business ever do it that way?", the answer still comes back "no". A decent amount of practice can be documented in Web-automated no-human two-party contract formation and execution transactions in RosettaNet. Maybe other places (OBI?). I'd be very interested in live examples of multi-party or even multi-transaction collaborations where business contracts (e.g. orders) were formed and fulfilled. -Bob Haugen