Re: Can we break Rule One? (was RE: Proposed Draft Charter for Choreo graphy WG)

bhaugen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.services.ws-arch
Message-ID <002701c289a0$72f18a00$b8eafea9@default>
I suspect some possible misunderstandings
and so will attempt to clarify a couple of facets
of my recent messages and then will probably
go back to lurking:

1. I am not suggesting ws-arch do a bunch of
legal research or embed a bunch of legal rules
into a choreography standard.  Far from it.
Be very very afraid.

2. I wasn't criticizing David Burdett's business example
when I asked how much of it had been implemented
by anybody.  

My point in both cases was that as far as I can tell,
nobody has done much actual execution of complex
multi-party business choreographies where actual
legal commitments were involved.

So when somebody says, "this is how EDI does it",
I ask "did anybody ever automated it that way in EDI?"
and the answer so far is invariably "no".

Or when somebody says "this is how 'business' does it"
and I ask "did anybody in business ever do it that way?",
the answer still comes back "no".

A decent amount of practice can be documented in 
Web-automated no-human two-party contract formation 
and execution transactions in RosettaNet.  
Maybe other places (OBI?). 
I'd be very interested in live examples of multi-party 
or even multi-transaction collaborations where 
business contracts (e.g. orders) were formed and fulfilled.

-Bob Haugen
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.