RE: Query from the trout pond
"Jean-Jacques Dubray" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.services.ws-arch |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <00a601c290d3$5090a0b0$f07e14ac@JJD> |
>>a) do people agree that the complexity of the XML-related specs is a >>significant problem? [JJ] It is not so much their complexity which is a problem but rather the combination of complexity and their ability to mutate at arbitrary time to totally different form. There is also a lack of formalism to define the semantics of a specification. We need a meta-specification that specifies all the artifacts that need to be present in an XML-based specification. A UML diagram comes to mind. Without these standard artifacts, it requires more investment from the people that need to understand these specifications. My two centimes JJ-