RE: UDDI's UUIDs issue

"David Orchard" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.services.ws-arch
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Ugo, I'm quite interested in the reasons.  I don't really want to raise it
as a wsa issue without doing some homework on this.  Perhaps could you ask
one or two of the appropriate UDDI folks for the ratoinale?  

Cheers,
Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On
> Behalf Of Ugo Corda
> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 3:42 PM
> To: Mark Baker; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: UDDI's UUIDs issue
> 
> 
> 
> I raised exactly this issue at the UDDI F2F last week, and I 
> was given a list of reasons why the existing http scheme 
> would not adequate (reasons that sounded good to me at the 
> time, but whose details I have unfortunately forgotten). 
> 
> If the WSA WG wants to officially investigate this issue, I 
> can ask the UDDI people who worked on version 3 under 
> UDDI.org to prepare a list of rationales for the WSA WG that 
> explain why a new URI scheme was necessary.
> 
> Ugo
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Baker [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 3:13 PM
> To: Ugo Corda
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: UDDI's UUIDs issue
> 
> 
> In this context, the "good practice" suggestion of the TAG to avoid
> using new URI schemes when existing ones would suffice (in this case,
> the "http" scheme would suffice), is also important, I believe;
> 
>   http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#URI-scheme
> 
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 02:56:35PM -0800, Ugo Corda wrote:
> > While going through the latest architecture doc draft, I 
> noticed that 5.1, Identifiers, has an issue about the UUID 
> identifiers used by UDDI. I think I can add some information 
> that can at least partially clarify the issue. 
> > 
> > Starting with version 3, the UDDI spec requires that all 
> keys be expressed as URIs (see [1]). It also recommends that 
> the URI scheme "uddi" be used. The UDDI TC plans to formally 
> register this new URI scheme in the near future. It is still 
> possible to use UUID-based identifiers, but they have to be 
> wrapped in a in a "uddi:" URI format.
> > 
> > Ugo
> > 
> > [1] 
> http://uddi.org/pubs/uddi-v3.00-published-20020719.htm#_Toc12653651
> 
> MB
> -- 
> Mark Baker.  Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.   http://www.markbaker.ca
> 
>    Will distribute objects for food
> 
>
winmail.dat (application/ms-tnef, 2.8 KB) - not displayed
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.