RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads
"Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler)" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.services.ws-arch |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <7FCB5A9F010AAE419A79A54B44F3718E01624855@bocnte2k3.boc.chevrontexaco.net> |
No, I think that I am referring to B2B, but maybe I'm not understanding what you are saying. If you are tallking about the firewall and proxies, I sort of consider that transparent. Or something that somebody else works out. Somebody like people from SeeBeyond, I guess. That is, there is communication of some sort between the backoffice stuff and a server that has access to the internet on my side, and similarly on the other side, but the primary messaging is just one hop between the B2B app on my server and the B2B app on the other side. Does this just display my ignorance? -----Original Message----- From: Ugo Corda [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 12:03 PM To: Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler); [email protected] Subject: RE: Reliable Messaging - Summary of Threads Roger, >There are MANY, MANY important business applications that involve simple A<->B communication. Are you referring to business applications within an enterprise? Because it seems to me that as soon as you do B2B you are likely to deal with intermediary nodes at the edge between Internet and intranet, and to deal with different transports. Ugo