Re: initial (ROUGH!) draft of extension fwk doc
"Christopher B Ferris" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.services.ws-arch |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <OFD8BA2DE2.DA8031D8-ON85256C95.004DB76F-85256C95.004DE3CC@rchland.ibm.com> |
Jean-Jacques, It isn't clear to me that we would want to have more than the framework itself in the arch doc as the WSAWG isn't supposed to be getting to tat level of detail. However, it might be possible to characterize it as an example that *could* be used... What do others think? Christopher Ferris Architect, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture email: [email protected] phone: +1 508 234 3624 "Jean-Jacques Moreau" <[email protected]> Sent by: [email protected] 12/19/2002 11:45 AM To [email protected] cc Subject Re: initial (ROUGH!) draft of extension fwk doc Chris, Just looking again at your first draft. What about adding an abstract MEPs, namely request-response, described from the SOAP request-response MEP? Jean-Jacques.