RE: Issue 5; GET vs GetLastTradePrice
"Champion, Mike" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.services.ws-arch |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> -----Original Message----- > From: David Orchard [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 1:14 PM > To: 'Champion, Mike'; [email protected] > Subject: RE: Issue 5; GET vs GetLastTradePrice > > > > > There is even a third alternative. Maybe there are NO generalized > optimizations we can make for web services because of the > huge variety of > applications. Therefore all we could really do is provide template or > "best-practice" optimizations, ie "If you want multiple > protocol access then prefer HTTP POST", "If you want ad-hoc > client invokes of a well-defined and > published protocol, don't do multiple protocols and heavily > use HTTP GET", That's about where I've ended up after a year of this debate, FWIW. > etc. The point being that maybe Web services is bigger than > the Web, in the > sense that the Web made certain optimizations that Web > services can't make > because Web services is targetting a wider scope of applications. Sounds like the "what are the properties of the Web and of Web services" analysis we've been trying to find the time/energy/neurons to do for awhile now!