RE: REST; good for humans and machines
"Assaf Arkin" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.services.ws-arch |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> Imagine opening an IIOP connection to a remote, untrusted server. What > method's can you invoke at that point? Any method which I have credentials to access? > Now imagine opening an HTTP connection to the same remote, untrusted > server. What methods can you invoke then? Any method which I have credentials to access? arkin > > That's the difference between transport and transfer, and between layer > 6 and layer 7. > > > Actually, by your logic, the comparsion of REST to Web services > doesn't make sense, either, as they also are defined at different > levels of the stack. > > Hmm, no, REST isn't a protocol, it's an architectural style. > > But if you mean that Web services doesn't specify any methods (i.e. does > not define a coordination language), whereas REST does, then I agree. > > MB > -- > Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca > Web architecture consulting, technical reports, evaluation & analysis >