Re: REST; good for humans and machines
"Christopher B Ferris" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.services.ws-arch |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <OF39ADEB01.5A517F11-ON85256CA6.004A6701-85256CA6.004B1A07@rchland.ibm.com> |
+1 Christopher Ferris Architect, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture email: [email protected] phone: +1 508 234 3624 [email protected] wrote on 01/05/2003 02:21:49 PM: > > +1 (more, actually) > > > > So, I'll clarify what I said earlier: If the representations being passed > > around are being processed by humans, the REST interfaces are sufficient -- > > they just have to deliver the information, and the human reads it (or fills > > out the form, or finds an appropriate hyperlink, or whatever). If the > > representations are being processed by machines, additional interface > > constraints are necessary. > > > > > My contention is that it is the COMPLETE SPECIFICATION of the data passed in > > each direction that constitutes the "interface" to a web service, RESTfully > > or non-RESTfully, so it is misleading to say that REST provides a uniform > > interface for web services. > > >