Re: REST; good for humans and machines

"Christopher B Ferris" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.services.ws-arch
Message-ID <OF39ADEB01.5A517F11-ON85256CA6.004A6701-85256CA6.004B1A07@rchland.ibm.com>
+1

Christopher Ferris
Architect, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
email: [email protected]
phone: +1 508 234 3624

[email protected] wrote on 01/05/2003 02:21:49 PM:

> 
> +1 (more, actually)
> 
> 
> > So, I'll clarify what I said earlier:  If the representations being 
passed
> > around are being processed by humans, the REST interfaces are 
sufficient --
> > they just have to deliver the information, and the human reads it (or 
fills
> > out the form, or finds an appropriate hyperlink, or whatever).  If the
> > representations are being processed by machines, additional interface
> > constraints are necessary. 
> 
> 
> 
> > My contention is that it is the COMPLETE SPECIFICATION of the data 
passed in
> > each direction that constitutes the "interface" to a web service, 
RESTfully
> > or non-RESTfully, so it is misleading to say that REST provides a 
uniform
> > interface for web services.
> 
> 
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.