RE: Binding

"David Orchard" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.services.ws-arch
Message-ID <[email protected]>
When I say "finish off", I mean get to the heart of any differences.

I am also against obfuscation.  I think we agree that we should focus on the
technical aspects - like who knows what, when and how.

Cheers,
Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On
> Behalf Of Miles Sabin
> Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 12:30 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Binding
>
>
>
> David Orchard wrote,
> > Excellent.  I'd tried to do the same earlier as well.  There's a
> > little bit more to do to finish this off.
> <snip/>
>
> Before you get _too_ enthusiastic, I'd just like to point out that I
> think there _are_ interesting ideas lurking in REST once you get past
> the proselytizing, and they don't depend on human interaction
> any more
> than any other approach.
>
> IMO, what's distinctive and interesting about REST is that it
> corresponds quite naturally to a programming model
> surprisingly similar
> to formal models of distributed and mobile systems, the Pi
> calculus in
> particular. That model is _very_ different from RPC-like programming
> models, and definitely worth consideration, especially wrt
> choreography/orchestration.
>
> I'm against obfuscation, not REST, and saddened that
> half-baked (no pun
> intended) advocacy is getting in the way of teasing out it's genuine
> merits.
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Miles
>
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.